Shark Feeding Case: Conservationist gets probation and $1,500 fine
Of The Year
FISH AND WILDLIFE
Shark Feeding Case Summary
If divers had been dropped off just one-quarter mile further from the Palm Beach County shoreline, they would have been in federal waters — and Randall Jordan wouldn’t have done anything wrong.
Jordan was convicted of leading a dive group into Florida waters to feed sharks, and this week the evidence in his trial showed that he did so illegally. The jury, therefore, found him guilty on three misdemeanor charges including unlawful operation of the vessel for hire as well as two counts involving engaging in fish feeding practices without permission from state authorities or management groups who oversee these activities. He was sentenced to a year of probation, with the possibility for community service and an $1,500 fine. Palm Beach County Judge Sheree Cunningham withheld finding guilt despite this being his first offense.
The debate in the court case this afternoon focused on whether or not Jordan was indeed within state waters. Assistant State Attorney Sherri Collins and fellow prosecutor Andrew Sando argued that there is overwhelming evidence for their side, which claims he was found guilty because of his proximity to these shores at the time when it happened. “That was his business, to bring people out and show them sharks,” Collins said. “And it wasn’t working in federal waters.”
Collins asked Cunningham not to sentence Jordan, but instead order him pay for the investigation costs as punishment. Collins and Sando have three months to determine the investigative costs before a hearing will be held where Jordan may have to pay.
When attorneys for Jordan failed to argue that the divers were in state waters, Jonathan Wasserman said he had no intention or incentive to break any law. “There’s no barbed wire fence out there that keeps fish from going past a certain point,” Wasserman said. “If Mr. Jordan wants to feed sharks, they’re going to go where he is.”
“I OWE ATTORNEY SANDO MY LIFE AND FOR THAT, I AM FOREVER GRATEFUL…”
“Attorney Sando took on my case when I had just received an intimidating felony charge. He was not only the most compassionate attorney I had spoken to, but also had the utmost confidence in his ability to make sure that I did not just ruin my life at a ripe age of 18. After all his hard work, I received a “No Information” and I cannot express the extreme gratitude and the sense of relief that I felt when I realized that Attorney Sando fought for me to be able to be here today, at 21, pursuing a legal degree. I would recommend Attorney Sando to anyone who is struggling because he is truly the reason I am where I am and who I am today. I owe Attorney Sando my life and for that, I am forever grateful to have been blessed to encounter such a great, hard-working, professional and intelligent attorney such as him.”
“I TRULY APPRECIATE HIS COMPASSION, AND ATTENTION TO DETAIL.”
Attorney Sando got all my charges completely dropped! After retaining him for my case, he answered every phone call I made, returned all my messages, and he always answered my questions. He was an invaluable asset to me in the courtroom. His legal knowledge and confidence produced the best possible outcome in my case. I truly appreciate his compassion, and attention to detail. He made me feel very comfortable and I confidently put my faith and trust in him. He was committed to acting in my best interest.
“I WOULD HIGHLY RECOMMEND HIM TO REPRESENT OTHERS IN MY POSITION…”
“As soon as I retained Attorney Sando as my attorney and provided the details of my case, he immediately provided a strategic action plan. Throughout my case he remained very attentive to my questions and concerns and also provided me with great insight, given his extensive legal background. As my case progressed, he continued to keep me updated and made sure that I was comfortable about every decision that was being made on my behalf. I would highly recommend him to represent others in my position. He is very detailed, knowledgeable and will fight tirelessly for his clients. He got all charges against me dismissed.”
When dealing with a criminal or immigration related issue, it is generally advisable to retain the assistance of a lawyer. Lawyers can offer you more than simply an understanding of the law. After reviewing your criminal or immigration case, an experienced defense lawyer should be able to identify the legal strengths and weaknesses in your case based on the evidence, the lack of evidence, or conflicts in the evidence. Trained lawyers also know how to navigate the legal justice system such as court hearings, researching case law, filing motions, managing plea negotiations, and preparing for trial.
It depends. Criminal violations require a licensed attorney to represent you. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. If you are facing a noncriminal violation, then generally speaking you can represent yourself; however, here at Sando Law, P.A., it is highly recommended that you call us before paying any ticket. Oftentimes people are not aware that the payment of a ticket or noncriminal violation is a “guilty” admission on their record and a waiver of all legal challenges or issues with their case. If you are unsure, call Attorney Sando for a free case review to see how we may help you.
There is no set answer to this question. The costs of a lawyer can differ based on so many factors such as the charge(s) itself, the jurisdiction, the timing, the experience of the lawyer, and the scope of representation. We recommend always conveying specific expectations you have when choosing a lawyer and asking a lot of questions!
This may seem like an easy answer but it actually depends. In certain situations, a client may need court approval to switch lawyers. The timing of this request is often the most influential factor. Switching lawyers in the early stages of a criminal or immigration case is generally accepted and allowed. Courts and Judges prefer that Defendants are adequately represented, especially when personal liberties may be in jeopardy.
Everyone is different and people choose lawyers for all types of reasons. You may have had a strong referral from a friend or family member, you may be facing a specific charge and want a lawyer with a unique area of specialization, or you may simply choose a lawyer because you got the right “vibe” from your conversations or your research. Just follow your instinct and take your time. Choosing a lawyer that you trust and feel can meet your expectations is an important decision.